{"id":216651,"date":"2023-08-08T09:05:22","date_gmt":"2023-08-08T08:05:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/letstalktalent.co.uk\/?p=216651"},"modified":"2023-08-20T09:58:38","modified_gmt":"2023-08-20T08:58:38","slug":"is-the-70-20-10-model-still-relevant-to-learning-and-development","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/letstalktalent.co.uk\/blog\/is-the-70-20-10-model-still-relevant-to-learning-and-development\/","title":{"rendered":"Is the 70\/20\/10 model still relevant to learning and development?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Optimising the learning experience of the modern workforce<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As most HR professionals know, the 70-20-10 learning and development (L&D)<\/a> model states that individuals gain most of their knowledge from on-the-job training, some from networking and professional relationships, and the rest from formal training courses and resources. However, considering the evolution of technology and employees\u2019 learning habits, is this 40-year-old model still relevant and suitable for the modern workforce?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to LinkedIn, \u201c(…) a massive 94% of employees say they would stay at a company longer if it invested in their learning and development.<\/a>\u201d And considering the cost of attrition for businesses, we can all agree that investing in L&D is a no-brainer. But whilst spending budget on L&D may be a given, how to split said budget effectively remains open for discussion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n

In this article, you will discover:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n